How should you read the result?
The chart counts thirty claim groups, rather than answers or brand mentions. Twenty have supporting sources, four are contradicted, and six are unresolved. Inspect evidence origin and text.
Discover recurring claims about your brand and inspect their source evidence and verification status.
An advance subscription is required to use the service. Send your request using the form below.
API measurements and separately measured interfaces can produce different results. Measurements describe the configured prompts and retrieval context.
Discover recurring claims about your brand and inspect their source evidence and verification status. Processed answers are required. Source verification depends on project settings and available evidence; automated results are not a comprehensive fact-checking guarantee.
Northstar · illustrative project · comparable 30-day periods. These examples explain how to use and interpret the measurements.
Claim groups
30Supported groups
20Contradicted groups
4Figures shown are illustrative sample data.
Cumulative illustration ending at twelve groups, not a processing-time promise.
Figures shown are illustrative sample data.
| Metric / scope | Sample value | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| “Offers small-business packages” | Supported by owned source | northstar.example/services |
| “Only serves large businesses” | Contradicted | The package description provides contrary evidence |
| “Fastest provider” | Unresolved | No adequate comparison evidence |
Figures shown are illustrative sample data.
The chart counts thirty claim groups, rather than answers or brand mentions. Twenty have supporting sources, four are contradicted, and six are unresolved. Inspect evidence origin and text.
Prioritise repeated commercially important inaccuracies for review of the original answers and current web information.
Frequency does not prove truth. Owned-source support is not an independent external verification.
AI claims Northstar serves only large businesses, while its service page describes a small-business package. Reviewing the claim and evidence together helps investigate inaccurate brand portrayals.
An illustrative scenario, not a customer result or a promise of results.
Processed answers are required. Source verification depends on project settings and available evidence; automated results are not a comprehensive fact-checking guarantee.
A mention establishes that the brand appears; a claim describes what the answer says about it. One answer may contain several claims.
No. Available evidence is insufficient to support or contradict the claim.
Important information and an optional source URL can be recorded for subsequent verification. This does not directly change platform answers.
Check the selected question or URL, filters, sample size, source coverage, and data freshness. Different scopes can produce differences unrelated to a real change.
No. A source connection, retrieval, or processing step may be missing. Check availability before interpreting an empty block.
The feature supports evidence-based investigation. It does not control provider answers or guarantee recommendations or citations.
Check how AI speaks about your brand, including the context of recommendations and criticism.
Explore this feature →: Sentiment and topicsFind out which pages receive citations and how often your own website appears among them.
Explore this feature →: Sources and citationsExplore one question’s measured answers, owned mentions, competitors, and connected owned or external URLs.
Explore this feature →: Prompt 360Tell us which brand and website you want to measure and what question you need to answer. We will discuss the subscription and data connections your project requires.